
doi: 10.1145/41526.41535
The processing of biomedical signals took many steps forward in the two decades that followed the introduction of digital computers to the field in the late 50s. Along with my colleagues at the Central Institute for the Deaf and at the Biomedical Computer Laboratory, I was privileged to participate in this exciting early period of biomedical computing. Some of my experiences with projects, both successful and unsuccessful, in evoked response audiometry, neurophysiology, fetal electrocardiography, radiation treatment planning, electrocardiographic rhythm analysis and ambulatory monitoring of electrocardiographic rhythms are described. These recollections give less attention to scientific results than they do to selected anecdotes and observations.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
