
doi: 10.1145/3816141
Tactile properties of fabrics convey vital information and influence customer decision and satisfaction. The understanding of the tactile properties is not comprehensive due to the multiple tactile properties and the various ways of assessing them. Here, we designed a series of psychophysical experiments to evaluate the multiple tactile properties, including flexible-stiff, smooth-rough, soft-firm, spongy-crisp, warm-cool, using images of flat fabric, draped fabric, rotating fabric, and real fabrics where only touch was allowed, only vision was allowed, and both touch and vision were allowed. Our results show that it is necessary to study the separate tactile properties rather than treat them as a whole. The tactile perception remained consistent yet slightly different among images, videos, and real fabrics. However, for warm-cool, highly consistent perception can be obtained regardless of the condition. Additionally, the tactile properties are not completely independent to each other. Positive and negative correlations among the different tactile perceptions were also observed in our study. In addition, the differences between visual representations of fabrics and real fabrics were also observed for the perception of flexible-stiff, smooth-rough, soft-firm, and warm-cool.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
