
arXiv: 2309.12818
Proper design of automated market makers (AMMs) is crucial for decentralized token exchanges in cryptoeconomic systems. At the intersection of software engineering and economics, AMM design is, however, complex and, if done inappropriately, can lead to financial risks and inefficiencies. To address this, we developed an AMM taxonomy for systematically comparing AMM designs and propose three AMM archetypes that meet key requirements for token issuance and exchange. This work bridges software engineering and economic disciplines, providing guidance for designing AMMs tailored to diverse use cases and fostering sustainable cryptoeconomic systems.
FOS: Economics and business, FOS: Computer and information sciences, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/330, Quantitative Finance - Trading and Market Microstructure, Computer Science - Cryptography and Security, ddc:330, Economics, Cryptography and Security (cs.CR), Trading and Market Microstructure (q-fin.TR)
FOS: Economics and business, FOS: Computer and information sciences, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/330, Quantitative Finance - Trading and Market Microstructure, Computer Science - Cryptography and Security, ddc:330, Economics, Cryptography and Security (cs.CR), Trading and Market Microstructure (q-fin.TR)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
