
doi: 10.1145/3725282
This paper studies enhancement of training data D to improve the robustness of machine learning (ML) classifiers M against adversarial attacks on relational data. Data enhancing aims to (a) defuse poisoned imperceptible features embedded in D , and (b) defend against attacks at prediction time that are unseen in D . We show that while there exists an inherent tradeoff between the accuracy and robustness of M in case (b), data enhancing can improve both the accuracy and robustness at the same time in case (a). We formulate two data enhancing problems accordingly, and show that both problems are intractable.Despite the hardness, we propose a framework that integrates model training and data enhancing. Moreover, we develop algorithms for (a) detecting and debugging corrupted imperceptible features in training data, and (b) selecting and adding adversarial examples to training data to defend against unseen attacks at prediction time. Using real-life datasets, we empirically verify that the method is at least 20.4% more robust and 2.02X faster than SOTA methods for classifiers M , without degrading the accuracy of M .
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
