
arXiv: 2207.00419
The remarkable success of deep learning in various domains relies on the availability of large-scale annotated datasets. However, obtaining annotations is expensive and requires great effort, which is especially challenging for videos. Moreover, the use of human-generated annotations leads to models with biased learning and poor domain generalization and robustness. As an alternative, self-supervised learning provides a way for representation learning that does not require annotations and has shown promise in both image and video domains. In contrast to the image domain, learning video representations are more challenging due to the temporal dimension, bringing in motion and other environmental dynamics. This also provides opportunities for video-exclusive ideas that advance self-supervised learning in the video and multimodal domains. In this survey, we provide a review of existing approaches on self-supervised learning focusing on the video domain. We summarize these methods into four different categories based on their learning objectives: (1) pretext tasks , (2) generative learning , (3) contrastive learning , and (4) cross-modal agreement . We further introduce the commonly used datasets, downstream evaluation tasks, insights into the limitations of existing works, and the potential future directions in this area.
I.4.0, FOS: Computer and information sciences, I.2.10, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), A.1; I.4.0; I.2.10, Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Science - Multimedia, A.1, Multimedia (cs.MM)
I.4.0, FOS: Computer and information sciences, I.2.10, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), A.1; I.4.0; I.2.10, Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Science - Multimedia, A.1, Multimedia (cs.MM)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 119 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
