
arXiv: 2005.10322
Latent-factor models (LFM) based on collaborative filtering (CF), such as matrix factorization (MF) and deep CF methods, are widely used in modern recommender systems (RS) due to their excellent performance and recommendation accuracy. However, success has been accompanied with a major new arising challenge: Many applications of machine learning (ML) are adversarial in nature [146]. In recent years, it has been shown that these methods are vulnerable to adversarial examples, i.e., subtle but non-random perturbations designed to force recommendation models to produce erroneous outputs. The goal of this survey is two-fold: (i) to present recent advances on adversarial machine learning (AML) for the security of RS (i.e., attacking and defense recommendation models) and (ii) to show another successful application of AML in generative adversarial networks (GANs) for generative applications, thanks to their ability for learning (high-dimensional) data distributions. In this survey, we provide an exhaustive literature review of 76 articles published in major RS and ML journals and conferences. This review serves as a reference for the RS community working on the security of RS or on generative models using GANs to improve their quality.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Computer Science - Cryptography and Security, H.3.3, Cryptography and Security (cs.CR), Computer Science - Multimedia, Information Retrieval (cs.IR), Computer Science - Information Retrieval, Machine Learning (cs.LG), Multimedia (cs.MM)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Computer Science - Cryptography and Security, H.3.3, Cryptography and Security (cs.CR), Computer Science - Multimedia, Information Retrieval (cs.IR), Computer Science - Information Retrieval, Machine Learning (cs.LG), Multimedia (cs.MM)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 172 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
