
arXiv: 1908.04705
State-of-the-art machine learning frameworks support a wide variety of design features to enable a flexible machine learning programming interface and to ease the programmability burden on machine learning developers. Identifying and using a performance-optimal setting in feature-rich frameworks, however, involves a non-trivial amount of performance profiling efforts and often relies on domain-specific knowledge. This article takes a deep dive into analyzing the performance impact of key design features in a machine learning framework and quantifies the role of parallelism. The observations and insights distill into a simple set of guidelines that one can use to achieve much higher training and inference speedup. Across a diverse set of real-world deep learning models, the evaluation results show that the proposed performance tuning guidelines outperform the Intel and TensorFlow recommended settings by 1.30× and 1.38×, respectively.
Performance (cs.PF), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Computer Science - Performance, Computer Science - Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing, Statistics - Machine Learning, Machine Learning (stat.ML), Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC), Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Performance (cs.PF), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Computer Science - Performance, Computer Science - Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing, Statistics - Machine Learning, Machine Learning (stat.ML), Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC), Machine Learning (cs.LG)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
