
doi: 10.1145/3371925
Real-world datasets often suffer from various data quality problems. Several data cleaning solutions have been proposed so far. However, data cleaning remains a manual and iterative task that requires domain and technical expertise. Exploiting metadata promises to improve the tedious process of data preparation, because data errors are detectable through metadata. This article investigates the intrinsic connection between metadata and data errors. In this work, we establish a mapping that reflects the connection between data quality issues and extractable metadata using qualitative and quantitative techniques. Additionally, we present a taxonomy based on a closed grammar that covers all existing metadata and allows the composition of novel types of metadata. We provide a case-study to show the practical application of the grammar for generating new metadata for data quality assessment.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
