
Whether we like it or not, deception happens every day and everywhere: thousands of trials taking place daily around the world; little white lies: "I'm busy that day!" even if your calendar is blank; news "with a twist" (a.k.a. fake news) meant to attract the readers attraction, and get some advertisement clicks on the side; portrayed identities, on dating sites and elsewhere. Can a computer automatically detect deception in written accounts or in video recordings? In this talk, I will describe our work in building linguistic and multimodal algorithms for deception detection, targeting deceptive statements, trial videos, fake news, identity deceptions, and also going after deception in multiple cultures. I will also show how these algorithms can provide insights into what makes a good lie - and thus teach us how we can spot a liar. As it turns out, computers can be trained to identify lies in many different contexts, and they can do it much better than humans do!
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
