
Knowledge acquisition often requires the assessment of qualitative stimuli (e.g., criteria or priorities) such as public safety or the degree of environmental damage. Weights, reflecting the relative importance of the objectives concerned are one of the most commonly used solutions for this kind of data. Subjective judgments involve inaccuracy (which is difficult to control) and consistency of judgments (which can be measured and used to influence the accuracy). The consistency-driven pairwise comparisons method is based on an inconsistency index and its use as a validation technique. Knowledge acquisition using the consistency-driven pairwise comparisons method, when supported by properly designed software, contributes to the improvement of the quality of knowledge-based systems.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
