
A possible resolution of the incompatibility of quantum mechanics and general relativity is that the relativity principle is emergent. I show that the central paradox of black holes also occurs at a liquid-vapor critical surface of a bose condensate but is resolved there by the phenomenon of quantum criticality. I propose that real black holes are actually phase boundaries of the vacuum analogous to this, and that the Einstein field equations simply fail at the event horizon the way quantum hydrodynamics fails at a critical surface. This can occur without violating classical general relativity anywhere experimentally accessible to external observers. Since the low-energy effects that occur at critical points are universal, it is possible to make concrete experimental predictions about such surfaces without knowing much, if anything about the true underlying equations. Many of these predictions are different from accepted views about black holes — in particular the absence of Hawking radiation and the possible transparency of cosmological black hole surfaces.
Black holes, quantum gravity, superfluidity, emergence, FOS: Physical sciences, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc), Quantization of the gravitational field, Phase transitions (general) in equilibrium statistical mechanics, criticality, Space-time singularities, cosmic censorship, etc., General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Black holes, quantum gravity, superfluidity, emergence, FOS: Physical sciences, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc), Quantization of the gravitational field, Phase transitions (general) in equilibrium statistical mechanics, criticality, Space-time singularities, cosmic censorship, etc., General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
