descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Preprint , Other literature type 01 Jan 2012Embargo end date: 01 Jan 2007 English Publisher:Canadian Science PublishingJournal:Canadian Journal of Physics, volume 90, pages 91-95 (issn: 0008-4204, eissn: 1208-6045,

Authors: Sert I.; Pirinççiog˜lu N.;

doi: 10.1139/p11-146 , 10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/0701160

arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0701160

handle: 11454/18982

Differences between scalar field and scalar density field solutions

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Differences between scalar field and scalar density solutions are explored using a Robertson–Walker (RW) metric, and a nonrelativistic Hamiltonian is derived for a scalar density field in the post-newtonian approximation. The results are compared with those of a scalar field. The expanding universe in a RW metric and a post-newtonian solution of the Klein–Gordon equation are discussed separately.

Related Organizations

Keywords

FOS: Physical sciences, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc), General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Found an issue? Give us feedback

Average

Green

bronze

Fields of Science

Fields of Science

Funded by

UKRI| Instream Tidal Energy Research (InTER) Project