
doi: 10.1139/m91-010
We followed the diel and summer variations of bacterioplankton production (estimated from [3H] thymidine incorporation) and abundance (direct count with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining) at four depths in a Canadian Shield humic lake. We found production to be highest and most variable in the epilimnion, but the differences between production estimates made at different times were statistically significant in only 5 out of 16 cases. Production differed significantly among depths in 14 out of 18 trials. The renewal time of the bacterial community varied between 1 and 20 days. Bacterioplankton production and primary production were uncorrelated (r = 0.225; p > 0.2), but bacterial production and chlorophyll a concentration were positively correlated (r = 0.816; p < 0.005). Small coccis (~0.3 – ~0.8 μm) represented between 52 and 80% of the bacterial cells in all the samples. There was no correspondence between bacterial production and frequency of dividing cells. Bacterial production and abundance varied inversely throughout the season, bacteria being two to three times less concentrated in the spring, whereas production was two to three times higher. We found no correlation between bacterioplankton production and abundance (r = 0.012; p > 0.5). Our results demonstrate the importance of small-scale sampling and the difficulty with which bacterioplankton production, its spatiotemporal variations, and the relationships between bacteria and phytoplankton can be predicted. Key words: bacterioplankton, abundance, production, spatiotemporal variations, bacterioplankton–phytoplankton relationships.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
