Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Canadian Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Canadian Journal of Microbiology
Article . 1978 . Peer-reviewed
License: CSP TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Enterobacteriaceae in ground meats

Authors: L K, Ng; M E, Stiles;

Enterobacteriaceae in ground meats

Abstract

Presumptive Escherichia coli counts for 312 samples of non-frozen ground beef were determined and compared with proposed Canadian standards. Results for frozen pork sausages, packaged at manufacturer level, indicated little difference in distribution of presumptive E. coli loads compared with retail ground beef. Use of solid media and direct inoculation of EC broth at 45 °C did not give alternative, rapid methods of estimating E. coli loads in ground beef. Counts on violet red bile agar (VRBA) within 18–24 h incubation at 35 °C gave reliable estimates of coliform bacteria (bile-precipitating colonies) and Enterobacteriaceae (total count), with only 1.3 and 10.7% false positives, respectively. Bile-precipitating isolates from VRBA were primarily E. coli, also Serratia liquefaciens, aerogenic Enterobacter agglomerans, Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Non-bile-precipitating colonies were primarily aerogenic E. agglomerans and S. liquefaciens; however, in the most probable number technique E. agglomerans was screened out. In addition to E. coli, E. agglomerans and S. liquefaciens were the principal types of Enterobacteriaceae in these samples. Enterobacter agglomerans gave a variety of IMViC reactions, including the type I (++−−) reaction, whereas S. liquefaciens were predominantly IMViC type −−++. Incubating EC broth at 45.5 °C, as opposed to 44.5 °C, reduced the number of false positives.

Keywords

Meat, Enterobacteriaceae, Food Handling, Swine, Escherichia coli, Food Microbiology, Animals, Cattle, Food Contamination, Culture Media

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!