
doi: 10.1139/g96-032
pmid: 8984000
A new method was developed to detect DNA methylation in the Citrus genome using random amplification coupled with restriction enzyme digestion. Genomic DNA from Citrus grandis (L.) Osb., Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf., and their F1hybrid was amplified using 7 individual 10-mer random primers. Prior to amplification the DNA templates were digested with 2 pairs of restriction endonucleases (HpaII–MspI and (or) Sau3AI–NdeII) with different sensitivities to cytosine methylation and after PCR amplification their amplified products were further digested with the same enzymes. Using this method, it was possible to detect 28 methylation events involving 23 amplified bands with the 7 random primers and 2 pairs of enzymes. A methylation polymorphism was found at a Sau3AI site in a 1.2-kb band amplified with one primer. One locus influencing cytosine methylation at this restriction site was identified through genetic analysis of a BC1population between C. grandis and P. trifoliata and was mapped to linkage group IV using an already developed core map. This technique for detecting methylation and methylation polymorphisms is simple and should be applicable to any eukaryotic species and to many situations where it is desirable to determine whether a sequence is methylated. Key words : Citrus grandis, Poncirus trifoliata, restriction endonuclease, polymerase chain reaction, RAPD.
Citrus, Cytosine, Base Sequence, DNA, Plant, Molecular Sequence Data, Restriction Mapping, Methylation, Genome, Plant, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, DNA Primers, Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique
Citrus, Cytosine, Base Sequence, DNA, Plant, Molecular Sequence Data, Restriction Mapping, Methylation, Genome, Plant, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, DNA Primers, Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
