Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Genomearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Genome
Article . 1992 . Peer-reviewed
License: CSP TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Genome
Article . 1992
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Chromosome errors at mitotic anaphase

Authors: Anthony Correll; Judith H. Ford;

Chromosome errors at mitotic anaphase

Abstract

Errors in mitotic divisions were assayed using various satellite DNAs as probes, hybridized in situ, to show that they included nondisjunction, chromosome and chromatid lagging, chromatid malsegregation, and monopolar segregations. The total rates of error were 1.7, 1.1, and 0.6% for chromosomes X, 17, and 18, respectively. Lagging was the most common error for all chromosomes and chromatid malsegregation, a source of 3:1 segregations occurred at about the same frequency as nondisjunction. In some cells, lagging of both X chromatids occurred and there were several cells where both X chromosomes showed errors in segregation. The disjunction of chromosomes was shown to be independent of their segregation and is speculated to involve a different mechanism.Key words: nondisjunction, lagging, in situ, satellite DNA, aneuploidy.

Keywords

Chromosome Aberrations, Genetic Techniques, Humans, Lymphocytes, Anaphase, Cells, Cultured

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    35
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
35
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!