Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 1989
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Genome
Article . 1989 . Peer-reviewed
License: CSP TDM
Data sources: Crossref
ZENODO
Article . 1989
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 1989
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
Genome
Article . 1990
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Intraspecific and interspecific genetic variation in Drosophila

Authors: J R, Powell; A, Caccone;

Intraspecific and interspecific genetic variation in Drosophila

Abstract

Utilizing the technique of DNA – DNA hybridization, we have characterized the degree of genetic variability in single-copy DNA both within and between several species of Drosophila. The results of intraspecific variation studies indicate considerable variation both for levels of nucleotide heterozygosity (estimated to be over 2%) as well as for insertions–deletions. Interspecific studies confirm this great deal of variability and further establish an extreme heterogeneity within Drosophila genomes for rates of divergence. This heterogeneity is much more extreme than that seen between exons and introns. The degree of single-copy DNA divergence generally supports phylogenetic affinities deduced from more traditional methods. However, exceptions occur where single-copy DNA divergence is not correlated with other properties such as degree of chromosomal differentiation, morphology, or ability to form interspecific hybrids. We argue that single-copy DNA divergence as measured by DNA–DNA hybridization is an accurate indicator of phylogenetic relationships and therefore sheds light on the evolution of other biological properties. Many, if not most, evolutionary tests require an accurate phylogeny of the group being studied and DNA, because of the high information content inherent within the molecule, offers the best hope of deriving true phylogenies.Key words: DNA evolution, Drosophila, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, DNA–DNA hybridization.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Insecta, Arthropoda, Reproduction, Diptera, Genetic Variation, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Biodiversity, Genetics, Population, Species Specificity, fruit flies, flies, Animals, Animalia, Drosophila, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
16
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Green