Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

A Bound on the Precision Required to Estimate a Boolean Perceptron from Its Average Satisfying Assignment

Authors: Paul W. Goldberg;

A Bound on the Precision Required to Estimate a Boolean Perceptron from Its Average Satisfying Assignment

Abstract

A Boolean perceptron is a linear threshold function over the discrete Boolean domain {0,1}n. That is, it maps any binary vector to 0 or 1, depending on whether the vector's components satisfy some linear inequality. In 1961, Chow showed that any Boolean perceptron is determined by the average or "center of gravity" of its "true" vectors (those that are mapped to 1), together with the total number of true vectors. Moreover, these quantities distinguish the function from any other Boolean function, not just from other Boolean perceptrons. In this paper we go further, by identifying a lower bound on the Euclidean distance between the average satisfying assignment of a Boolean perceptron and the average satisfying assignment of a Boolean function that disagrees with that Boolean perceptron on a fraction $\epsilon$ of the input vectors. The distance between the two means is shown to be at least $(\epsilon/n)^{O(\log(n/\epsilon)\log(1/\epsilon))}$. This is motivated by the statistical question of whether an empirical estimate of this average allows us to recover a good approximation to the perceptron. Our result provides a mildly superpolynomial upper bound on the growth rate of the sample size required to learn Boolean perceptrons in the "restricted focus of attention" setting. In the process we also find some interesting geometrical properties of the vertices of the unit hypercube.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!