
Summary: We study the general question of how characteristics of functional equations influence whether or not they are robust. We isolate examples of properties which are necessary for the functional equations to be robust. On the other hand, we show other properties which are sufficient for robustness. We then study a general class of functional equations, which are of the form \(\forall x,y\) \(F[f(x-y), f(x+y), f(x),f(y)]=0\), where \(F\) is an algebraic function. We give conditions on such functional equations that imply robustness. Our results have applications to the area of self-testing/correcting programs. We show that self-testers and self-correctors can be found for many functions satisfying robust functional equations, including algebraic functions of trigonometric functions such as \(\tan{x}\), \({1\over{1+\cot{x}}}\), \({Ax\over{1-Ax}}\), \(\cosh x\).
Software, source code, etc. for problems pertaining to difference and functional equations, Specification and verification (program logics, model checking, etc.), Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity, functional equations, Stability, separation, extension, and related topics for functional equations, property testing, robustness, trigonometric functions, program testing, robust functional equations, algebraic functions, Numerical methods for functional equations
Software, source code, etc. for problems pertaining to difference and functional equations, Specification and verification (program logics, model checking, etc.), Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity, functional equations, Stability, separation, extension, and related topics for functional equations, property testing, robustness, trigonometric functions, program testing, robust functional equations, algebraic functions, Numerical methods for functional equations
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 38 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
