Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao zbMATH Openarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
zbMATH Open
Article . 2016
Data sources: zbMATH Open
SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Article . 2016
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Sparse Sensor Placement Optimization for Classification

Sparse sensor placement optimization for classification
Authors: Bingni W. Brunton; Steven L. Brunton; Joshua L. Proctor; J. Nathan Kutz;

Sparse Sensor Placement Optimization for Classification

Abstract

Summary: Choosing a limited set of sensor locations to characterize or classify a high-dimensional system is an important challenge in engineering design. Traditionally, optimizing the sensor locations involves a brute-force, combinatorial search, which is NP-hard and is computationally intractable for even moderately large problems. Using recent advances in sparsity-promoting techniques, we present a novel algorithm to solve this Sparse Sensor Placement Optimization for Classification (SSPOC) that exploits low-dimensional structure exhibited by many high-dimensional systems. Our approach is inspired by compressed sensing, a framework that reconstructs data from few measurements. If only classification is required, reconstruction can be circumvented and the measurements needed are orders-of-magnitude fewer still. Our algorithm solves an \(\ell_1\) minimization to find the fewest nonzero entries of the full measurement vector that exactly reconstruct the discriminant vector in feature space; these entries represent sensor locations that best inform the decision task. We demonstrate the SSPOC algorithm on five classification tasks, using datasets from a diverse set of examples, including physical dynamical systems, image recognition, and microarray cancer identification. Once training identifies sensor locations, data taken at these locations forms a low-dimensional measurement space, and we perform computationally efficient classification with accuracy approaching that of classification using full-state data. The algorithm also works when trained on heavily subsampled data, eliminating the need for unrealistic full-state training data.

Keywords

Detection theory in information and communication theory, sparsity, \(\ell_1\)-minimization, Problems with incomplete information (optimization), feature selection, machine learning, image recognition, classification, Other numerical methods in calculus of variations, Image processing (compression, reconstruction, etc.) in information and communication theory, sensor placement optimization, Sampling theory in information and communication theory, compressed sensing

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    84
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
84
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!