
doi: 10.1137/0402042
Summary: One of of the assumptions made in classical scheduling theory is that a task is always executed by one processor at a time. With the advances in parallel algorithms, this assumption may not be valid for future task systems. In this paper, a new model of task systems is studied, the so- called Parallel Task System, in which a task can be executed by one or more processors at the same time. The complexity of scheduling Parallel Task Systems to minimize the schedule length is examined. For nonpreemptive scheduling, it is shown that the problem is strongly NP- hard even for two processors when the precedence constraints consist of a set of chains. For independent tasks, the problem is strongly NP-hard for five processors, but solvable in pseudo-polynomial time for two and three processors. For preemptive scheduling, it is shown that the problem is strongly NP-hard for arbitrary number of processors for a set of independent tasks. Furthermore, it is shown that it is NP-hard, but solvable in pseudo-polynomial time, for a fixed number of processors.
Parallel Task System, pseudo-polynomial time, Deterministic scheduling theory in operations research, Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity, nonpreemptive scheduling, strongly NP-hard, parallel algorithms, schedule length, Theory of operating systems
Parallel Task System, pseudo-polynomial time, Deterministic scheduling theory in operations research, Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity, nonpreemptive scheduling, strongly NP-hard, parallel algorithms, schedule length, Theory of operating systems
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 229 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
