
doi: 10.1137/0401007
Summary: A group testing problem with two irregular coins and with a test device that detects only an underweight coin is considered. The maximum number of tests required to identify two irregulars, one overweight and one underweight, is known to have a lower bound of 2 log n. We present a procedure that gives an upper bound of 2 log n\(+O(\log n \sqrt{\log n})\).
searching, Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity, underweight feedback, upper bound, Searching and sorting, group testing
searching, Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity, underweight feedback, upper bound, Searching and sorting, group testing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
