
doi: 10.1137/0218060
Summary: The problem of ranking the K-best binary trees with respect to their weighted average leaves' levels is considered. Both the alphabetic case, where the order of the weights in the sequence \(w_ 1,...,w_ n\) must be preserved in the leaves of the tree, and the nonalphabetic case, where no such restriction is imposed, are studied. For the alphabetic case a simple algorithm is provided for ranking the K-best trees based on a recursive formula of complexity \(0(Kn^ 3)\). For nonalphabetic trees two different ranking problems are considered, and for each of them it is shown that the next best tree can be solved by a dynamic programming formula of low complexity order.
ranking of solutions, Prefix, length-variable, comma-free codes, alphabetic and nonalphabetic trees, Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity, binary trees, Searching and sorting
ranking of solutions, Prefix, length-variable, comma-free codes, alphabetic and nonalphabetic trees, Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity, binary trees, Searching and sorting
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
