
doi: 10.1137/0212004
The authors examine the nonpreemptive assignment of n independent tasks to a system of m uniform processors with the objective of reducing the makespan, or the time required from the start of execution until all tasks are completed. Since the problem of finding a minimal makespan has been shown to be np-hard, and hence unlikely to permit an efficient solution procedure, near-optimal heuristic algorithms have been studied. It is known that lpt (longest processing time first) schedules are within twice the length of the optimum. They analyze a variation of the multifit algorithm derived from bin packing, and prove that its worst case performance bound is within 1.4 of the optimum. 10 references.
worst-case performance, Deterministic scheduling theory in operations research, heuristic, first-fit- decreasing, non-preemptive scheduling, uniform processors, Performance evaluation, queueing, and scheduling in the context of computer systems
worst-case performance, Deterministic scheduling theory in operations research, heuristic, first-fit- decreasing, non-preemptive scheduling, uniform processors, Performance evaluation, queueing, and scheduling in the context of computer systems
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 51 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
