
doi: 10.1136/vr.e4132
pmid: 22710327
AS part of my work as a veterinary consultation coach (whereby I stand-in on many consultations), I have noticed that a surprising number of younger vets do not make a clear and specific recommendation about what they believe to be the most effective way to resolve the patient's clinical issue. In contrast, the more experienced practitioners whom I observe are much more willing to ‘prescribe’ an opinion as to the best way forward. At first I assumed that this was the predictable behaviour of practitioners working with the confidence that comes with experience. However, during the ‘post-match’ analysis of the consultations, I was surprised when many of the recent graduates told me they were taught that they should not give clients a specific recommendation. Instead, they tell me, that vets should lay out all the options (with which I agree), discuss the pros and cons of each and then stand back and allow the client to choose the …
Veterinary Medicine, Decision Making, Humans, Professional-Patient Relations, Referral and Consultation, Veterinarians
Veterinary Medicine, Decision Making, Humans, Professional-Patient Relations, Referral and Consultation, Veterinarians
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
