
Effective invasive and non-invasive monitoring, when coupled with good clinical decision making, can improve outcomes for critically ill patients. When deciding on the best monitoring technique, it is important to consider the specific information that is needed to guide critical care management, while balancing the reliability of the data obtained and the risks of invasive monitor placement. Here, we review invasive and non-invasive options for hemodynamic and neurologic monitoring in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit. Understanding how each monitoring device functions, its indications, risks, and limitations is key when deciding how to monitor bedside physiologic data that guide clinical decision making. Level of evidence: Level IV
RD1-811, RC86-88.9, Surgery, Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid, Review
RD1-811, RC86-88.9, Surgery, Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid, Review
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
