Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Experiences with ureteroscopy

Authors: T J, Spalding;

Experiences with ureteroscopy

Abstract

Abstract Thirty-nine patients underwent 44 ureteroscopic procedures between January 1985 and August 1988 for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Twenty six procedures were undertaken on 23 patients for extraction of ureteric calculi and were successful on the initial attempt in 14 (61%). Four stones not removed on the first attempt were however disimpacted and subsequently passed spontaneously, and three more were removed at a second ureteroscopy. The overall success rate therefore was 91%. Only two patients required ureterolithotomy. Ureteroscopic stone extraction is therefore an effective technique with minimal morbidity and allows rapid return of servicemen to high category medical fitness.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Ureteral Calculi, Adolescent, Endoscopy, Cystoscopy, Middle Aged, Military Personnel, Humans, Ureteral Diseases, Female, Naval Medicine, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!