<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Community-based healthcare organisations manage competing, and often conflicting, priorities. These conflicts can arise from the multiple roles these organisations take up, and from the diverse range of stakeholders to whom they must be responsive. Often such conflicts may be titled conflicts of interest; however, what precisely constitutes such conflicts and what should be done about them is not always clear. Clarity about the duties owed by organisations and the roles they assume can help identify and manage some of these conflicts. Taking divisions of general practice in Australia as an example, this paper sets out to distinguish two main types of conflicts of interest, so that they may be more clearly identified and more effectively managed.
interest, 170, Decision Making, medical ehtics, Social and Behavioral Sciences, stakeholders, Education, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, Clinical, conflicts, Humans, conflicts of interest, Physician's Role, Ethics, general practice, divisions, Physician-Patient Relations, Conflict of Interest, 2201 Applied Ethics, Australia, Legal Ethics, practice, Ethics, Clinical, general, roles, Family Practice, 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences, Philosophy and Religious Studies
interest, 170, Decision Making, medical ehtics, Social and Behavioral Sciences, stakeholders, Education, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, Clinical, conflicts, Humans, conflicts of interest, Physician's Role, Ethics, general practice, divisions, Physician-Patient Relations, Conflict of Interest, 2201 Applied Ethics, Australia, Legal Ethics, practice, Ethics, Clinical, general, roles, Family Practice, 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences, Philosophy and Religious Studies
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |