
In the evaluation of patients with syncope, the critical first step is a detailed medical history. A diagnostic strategy based on initial evaluation is warranted. The importance of the initial evaluation goes well beyond its capability to make a diagnosis as it determines the most appropriate subsequent diagnostic pathways and risk evaluation. According to the Guidelines on Syncope of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)1,2 the “initial evaluation” of a patient presenting with syncope consists of taking a careful history, and a physical examination, including orthostatic blood pressure measurements and standard electrocardiogram (ECG). Three key questions should be addressed during the initial evaluation: Table 1 provides the clinical classification of the principal known causes of syncope proposed by the Task Force on Syncope of the ESC.1,2 The subdivision of syncope is based on pathophysiology as follows: View this table: Table 1 Causes of syncope
Diagnosis, Differential, Electrocardiography, Humans, Syncope
Diagnosis, Differential, Electrocardiography, Humans, Syncope
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 63 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
