
pmid: 18195121
Despite advances in the design of balloons and stents, restenosis remains a major drawback of coronary angioplasty. Multiple randomised trials have demonstrated that drug-eluting stents (DES) can significantly reduce rates of restenosis by 60–75% across both lesion and patient subsets. In recent years there has been an exponential increase in the worldwide use of DES. This expansion has occurred as a result of an enthusiastic extrapolation of results from randomised trials leading to “off-label” use of DES in anatomical or clinical high-risk scenarios, or both. However, emerging medium- to long-term follow-up data have raised concerns about the safety of DES. A number of analyses have recently shown increased rates of late stent thrombosis in patients with DES. The exact mechanisms leading to stent thrombosis remain unclear. This article critically reviews the available efficacy and safety data on DES and discusses the factors influencing our current practice and perception of the net value of DES.
Graft Occlusion, Vascular, Drug-Eluting Stents, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Prosthesis Failure, Coronary Restenosis, Treatment Outcome, Risk Factors, Humans, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Diabetic Angiopathies, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Graft Occlusion, Vascular, Drug-Eluting Stents, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Prosthesis Failure, Coronary Restenosis, Treatment Outcome, Risk Factors, Humans, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Diabetic Angiopathies, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
