Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Heartarrow_drop_down
Heart
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Heart
Article . 2013
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the evidence

Authors: Jan-Malte Sinning; Nikos Werner; Eberhard Grube; Georg Nickenig;

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the evidence

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the new standard-of-care for inoperable patients with better outcome than conservative management, including balloon valvuloplasty only. In high-risk patients, TAVI has clearly shown non-inferiority compared with surgical aortic valve replacement. Although data from national multicentre registries are very encouraging and we are already speculating about the use of TAVI in intermediate-risk patients, it is of note that the two commercially available and used transcatheter heart valves (THVs) have not yet been assessed by randomised clinical trials in those patients. Technological advances promise to simplify TAVI and to improve outcome by reducing the rate of TAVI-specific issues such as stroke, peri-prosthetic aortic regurgitation, acute kidney injury, vascular complications and conduction disturbances. Therefore, results from ongoing trials with the available THVs are urgently awaited. In future trials, screening, treatment and follow-up of TAVI patients will need to follow a standardised protocol to achieve better comparability of study data to address, decisively, the question of whether intermediate-risk or low-risk patients may also profit from a less invasive TAVI approach.

Keywords

Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation, Cardiac Catheterization, Treatment Outcome, Aortic Valve, Humans, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Registries

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    22
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
22
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?