Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Gutarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Gut
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
Gut
Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Gut
Article
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

PWE-020 Diagnosing Microscopic Colitis – Is Colonoscopy Necessary?: Abstract PWE-020 Table 1

Authors: A. Pennefather; George MacFaul; A. Abraham; T Chapman;

PWE-020 Diagnosing Microscopic Colitis – Is Colonoscopy Necessary?: Abstract PWE-020 Table 1

Abstract

Introduction Microscopic colitis is a common cause of chronic diarrhoea, particularly in older people, and the incidence is increasing. As the endoscopic appearance is typically normal, diagnosis of the two subtypes, collagenous and lymphocytic colitis, relies upon specific histology findings. When suspected, guidelines advise colonoscopy with full biopsy series due to reports of a patchy disease distribution, with false negative rates of up to 40% reported with flexible sigmoidoscopy. 1 However, more recent data has challenged this assumption, leaving considerable uncertainty. 2 We report one of the largest consecutive case series to date, examining whether flexible sigmoidoscopy alone is sufficient. Methods A retrospective review of all cases of microscopic colitis diagnosed at colonoscopy over a 12-year period (2001–2013) at our hospital was performed. Only colonoscopies with both right (proximal to splenic flexure) and left sided colonic biopsies were included. The diagnostic criteria for microscopic colitis were lymphocytic infiltration in the lamina propria and either >20 intraepithelial lymphocytes per 100 epithelial cells (lymphocytic colitis) or a collagenous layer >10 mm (collagenous colitis). The primary aim was to assess the proportion of patients in which microscopic colitis could be diagnosed on left sided biopsies alone. Results 84 patients were included in the study. 58 (69.0%) were female with a median age of 62 years. 44 (52.4%) had collagenous colitis and 40 (47.6%) lymphocytic colitis. 76 (90.5%) had features of microscopic colitis on both right and left sided biopsies, 7 (8.3%) right side only and 1 (1.2%) left side only. Hence a diagnosis of microscopic colitis could be made in 77 (91.7%) on left sided biopsies alone. Age, sex and histopathological subtype did not significantly alter the sensitivity of left sided biopsies. Conclusion Flexible sigmoidoscopy would have correctly diagnosed microscopic colitis in a very high proportion of patients (92%). Given that flexible sigmoidoscopy is less expensive, better tolerated, and can be combined with CT scanning to exclude a proximal malignancy, this may have important implications for the investigation of non-bloody diarrhoea. References Fernandez-Banares F et al . Incidence of collagenous and lymphocytic colitis: a 5-year population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 1999:94:418–23 Bjornbak C et al . Microscopic colitis: clinical findings, topography and persistence of histopathological subgroups. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011:34:1225–34 Disclosure of Interest None Declared.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
bronze