Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Gutarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Gut
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
Gut
Article . 1999 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Gut
Article . 1999
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The quality of quality of life

Authors: E J, Irvine;

The quality of quality of life

Abstract

See article on page 527 Functional bowel disorders are highly prevalent in the general population. In the US Householder Survey about 70% of respondents had at least one functional bowel disorder, 9.4% had irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and 2.9% had functional dyspepsia.1 These disorders often have significant symptom overlap making them difficult to distinguish.2 3 In this issue (see page 527), Chassany et al describe the initial development, preliminary psychometric testing and cross-cultural assessment of a multi-item disease specific health related quality of life (HRQOL) instrument for use in multinational clinical trials of IBS or functional dyspepsia. If only an efficacious therapy could be found! Health related quality of life assessment is becoming increasingly recognised as an important outcome and predictor for patients with chronic diseases. HRQOL is generally assessed by quantitative questionnaires completed by patients themselves which assess physical and psychosocial attitudes and function. The three kinds of HRQOL measures used in research and practice include global assessments, generic instruments and disease specific instruments.4 5The global assessment, usually a graded summary such as good, fair or poor or a 10 cm visual analog scale, may help to predict a relation between simple parameters, like disease severity and function, but is often inadequate for more sophisticated hypothesis testing. Generic instruments are multi-item problem lists that are meant to be independent of sex, age and disease and are applied to compare …

Related Organizations
Keywords

Treatment Outcome, Psychometrics, Culture, Quality of Life, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Colonic Diseases, Functional, Dyspepsia

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    13
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
13
Average
Top 10%
Average
bronze
Related to Research communities