
doi: 10.1136/ebm.13.6.166
pmid: 19043025
Illustrating risk and benefit to help patients make decisions about treatment (or no treatment) remains a challenge to health professionals. Many people have difficulty understanding numbers. This is compounded by the use of different denominators (eg, 1 in 50 v 3 in 100) that often occurs when professionals relay statistics from research. But good communication of numerical information is important. Rare events can be perceived as more likely than they really are, whereas more common outcomes are dismissed as unlikely. The lack of context for many probabilities also impairs judgment, and all of this ignores the other perceptual factors at play, …
Evidence-Based Medicine, Humans, Decision Support Techniques
Evidence-Based Medicine, Humans, Decision Support Techniques
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
