
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 11586803
One in three women and at least one in 12 men in the UK have osteoporosis, a condition which can lead to fractures, deformity, pain and disability, at a cost to the NHS of around £1.5 billion each year.1,2 Bisphosphonates offer a therapeutic option for preventing and treating osteoporosis. Here, we assess and compare the three bisphosphonates (alendronate, etidronate and ▼risedronate*) licensed for such use in the UK. We do not consider the four bisphosphonates (clodronate, pamidronate, tiludronate and ▼zoledronate) that are licensed in the UK only for the treatment of Paget's disease of bone and/or hypercalcaemia of malignancy.
Male, Alendronate, Diphosphonates, Etidronic Acid, Middle Aged, Humans, Osteoporosis, Female, Risedronic Acid, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Aged
Male, Alendronate, Diphosphonates, Etidronic Acid, Middle Aged, Humans, Osteoporosis, Female, Risedronic Acid, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Aged
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
