
doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6892
pmid: 31831462
Investigative journalism at The BMJ over the past decade has unearthed research fraud and misconduct, prompted improvements in transparency of clinical research, led to changes in guidelines and clinical practice, and triggered parliamentary inquiries in the EU and UK. Rebecca Coombes gives some highlights
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
