Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Prospective cohort studies: advantages and disadvantages

Authors: P. Sedgwick;

Prospective cohort studies: advantages and disadvantages

Abstract

Researchers investigated the association between opium use and subsequent risk of death. A prospective cohort study design was used. Participants were 50 045 people in north-eastern Iran aged 40-75 years at baseline. Recruitment took place between January 2004 and June 2008, and participants were followed until May 2011. The median length of follow-up was 4.7 years per participant. The main outcomes were death from all causes, plus all major subcategories.1 Information about opium use was collected at baseline. Participants were asked their age when they started using opium and subsequent length of use, typical amount used, frequency of use, and routes of administration. Information about exposure to a wide variety of other risk factors, including tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption, was also collected at baseline. During follow-up, participants were contacted annually by telephone with detailed questions about their health status and any hospital admissions or outpatient procedures. Opium use and exposure to other risk factors were not systematically updated. The study concluded that opium users have an increased risk of death from multiple causes compared with non-users. Increased risks were also seen in people who had used low amounts of opium for a long period, plus those who had no major illness before use. Which of the following statements, if any, are true? Statement a , b , and d …

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    35
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
35
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!