
doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6130
Researchers investigated whether a sham device (validated sham acupuncture needle) and an inert pill exerted a similar placebo effect in patients with persistent arm pain. A single blind randomised controlled trial study design was used. The study was created from the placebo run-in periods for two randomised placebo controlled trials nested within a larger study, the aim of which was to investigate the effectiveness of acupuncture and amitriptyline in relieving arm pain. One trial compared acupuncture (twice a week) with a validated acupuncture sham device for six weeks, whereas the other compared amitriptyline (25 mg once a day) with placebo for eight weeks. Both trials had a placebo run-in period of two weeks. The primary investigation in this study was the comparison of the sham device with placebo pill during the placebo run-in periods.1 Participants were 266 adults with arm pain caused by repetitive use, which had lasted at least three months despite treatment, who scored three or more on a 10 point pain scale. Trial participants were randomised to the acupuncture (n=133) or amitriptyline (n=133) trial. The primary outcome measure was arm pain measured on a 10 point pain scale. At …
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
