Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Odds and odds ratios

Authors: P. Sedgwick;

Odds and odds ratios

Abstract

Researchers evaluated the efficacy of intravitreous injections of bevacizumab for the treatment of neovascular age related macular degeneration. A prospective, double blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial study design was used. The intervention was intravitreous bevacizumab 1.25 mg, given as three loading injections at six week intervals and followed by further treatment if needed (again at six week intervals). The control was standard treatment—photodynamic therapy, intravitreal injections of pegaptanib, or intravitreal injections of placebo. Study participants were 131 patients (mean age 81 years) with wet age related macular degeneration.1 The primary outcome measure was a gain of 15 letters or more of visual acuity at one year from baseline assessed with an ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) visual acuity chart. Of 65 participants allocated to the intervention, 21 (32%) gained 15 letters or more of visual acuity from baseline compared with two (3%) of the control group (n=66). The odds of a gain of 15 letters or more of visual acuity at one year were 21/44 for the intervention group and 2/64 for the control group. The unadjusted odds ratio for the primary outcome when comparing the intervention with the control was 15.3 (95% confidence interval 3.4 to 68.5). When adjusted for age, sex, and baseline visual acuity, the odds ratio for the primary outcome when comparing the treatments …

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!