
doi: 10.1136/bmj.e1213
pmid: 22411917
Will be clearer once ongoing trials are complete Type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease and greater treatment intensity is needed over time to control increasingly abnormal glucose concentrations.1 In the linked article (doi:10.1136/bmj.e1369), Karagiannis and colleagues present a systematic review and meta-analysis of the risks and benefits associated with one of the relatively new classes of oral hypoglycaemic drugs, the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors.2 DPP-4 inhibitors reduce the breakdown of the glucose responsive incretin hormones, mainly glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1); they have multiple physiological effects that together normalise glucose homeostasis without increasing body weight.3 Because GLP-1 is released in response to raised rather than normal glucose concentrations, DPP-4 inhibitors may be less likely to cause hypoglycaemia than other oral hypoglycaemic agents.3 Increased GLP-1 activity is associated with favourable changes in cardiovascular risk parameters of weight, lipids, blood pressure, and ventricular function, but no trials of DPP-4 inhibitors that are powered to detect differences in cardiovascular events have been reported.4 Karagiannis and colleagues examined two potential roles of DPP-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes: as monotherapy (compared with metformin) and …
Blood Glucose, Glycated Hemoglobin, Male, Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Female, Metformin
Blood Glucose, Glycated Hemoglobin, Male, Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Female, Metformin
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
