Coping with scientific misconduct

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 20 Oct 2011 English Publisher:BMJJournal:BMJ, volume 343, pages d6586-d6586 (issn: 0959-8138, eissn: 1468-5833,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Elizabeth, Wager;

doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6586

pmid: 22016451

Coping with scientific misconduct

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Research misconduct can have serious implications, but getting it investigated is not always straightforward. Elizabeth Wager examines some of the difficulties

Keywords

Retraction of Publication as Topic, Advisory Committees, Scientific Misconduct, Periodicals as Topic, Editorial Policies

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	31
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 1%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%