
doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5875
A clinical image would seem an obvious choice for the BMJ ’s front cover. But each time we decide to use one we have to think an extra thought—will it upset the postal workers or readers’ children? Anything remotely gory tends to cause complaints. In the past we have covered potentially alarming or offensive images with an opaque wrapper. But we felt this was unnecessary for this week’s cover. I’m sure you (and the Royal Mail) will tell us if we were wrong. Either way we hope you’ll appreciate the image and read the two linked articles. They highlight the dangers of what A Fogo and colleagues call “rapidly …
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
