
doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2345
pmid: 21508060
#### Summary points Early attempts at refractive surgery used partial thickness corneal incisions to alter the curvature of the cornea, with the most popular technique being radial keratotomy. In 1990 the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy study found that outcomes were unpredictable and unstable, and this led to the use of ablative laser refractive surgery instead.1 We review evidence for the efficacy of laser refractive surgery mainly from randomised controlled trials and discuss suitability, contraindications, and potential complications of the procedure to help generalists in answering patients’ queries. #### Sources and selection criteria We searched PubMed for articles in English on laser refractive surgery. We also consulted guidelines issued by the Royal College of Ophthalmologists, the American Academy of Ophthalmologists, and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. We identified systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials as well as informative and relevant level C research. Search terms were “laser assisted in situ keratomileusis”, “laser epithelial keratomileusis”, “photoreactive keratotomy”, “myopia”, “hyperopia”, “astigmatism”, and “laser surgery”. Refractive error was recently reviewed in the BMJ .2 Refraction (measured in dioptres) is the process by which light is focused on the retina. The optical components of the eye are the lens, the length of the eyeball, and the cornea. The cornea provides three quarters of the overall refractive power of the eye. If the eyeball is too long …
Corneal Surgery, Laser, Contraindications, Patient Selection, Visual Acuity, Refraction, Ocular, Refractive Errors, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Preoperative Care, Humans, Medical History Taking
Corneal Surgery, Laser, Contraindications, Patient Selection, Visual Acuity, Refraction, Ocular, Refractive Errors, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Preoperative Care, Humans, Medical History Taking
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
