<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Consent for blood transfusion

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 24 Aug 2010 United Kingdom Publisher:BMJJournal:BMJ, volume 341, pages c4336-c4336 (issn: 0959-8138, eissn: 1468-5833,

Authors: Farrell, A-M; Brazier, M;

doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4336

pmid: 20736271

Consent for blood transfusion

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Millions of people receive blood transfusions each year, but many will not be fully aware of the risks. Anne-Maree Farrell and Margaret Brazier argue for a formalised consent procedure

Country

United Kingdom

Related Organizations

University of Bonn
Germany
University of Salford
United Kingdom
Queen's University Belfast
United Kingdom
Institute of Science and Ethics
Germany

Keywords

Blood Transfusion, Autologous, Informed Consent, Humans

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	15
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%