
doi: 10.1136/bmj.b733
pmid: 19286747
#### Summary points Thyroid nodules are common: 4-7% of the adults have a palpable nodule, and up to 50-70% will have nodules on high definition ultrasonography, which may cause considerable concern to patients. In this article, we present an evidence based guide to investigating and managing thyroid nodules and we discuss the myths about nodules. Where relevant, we also highlight the differences between the two most widely used guidelines on this topic: the recently issued second edition of the British Thyroid Association’s guidelines on thyroid cancer1 and the American Thyroid Association’s guidelines.2 These guidelines were formulated by two large committees of experts, who reviewed all the available evidence, which mainly consists of prospective and retrospective cohorts; where there was no evidence, expert consensus opinion was used. Traditional teaching states that 20-40% of thyroid nodules are malignant.3 However, this pertains to a highly selected group of patients, with solitary cold nodules on scintigraphy.4 The risk of malignancy for a thyroid nodule identified on ultrasonography is much lower: 4-7%.5 6 Little evidence is available on referral times. Relying on expert opinion, the British Thyroid Association’s guidelines say that most thyroid nodules are benign and therefore do not require urgent referral to secondary care.1 This advice …
Diagnosis, Differential, Incidental Findings, Biopsy, Fine-Needle, Humans, Thyroid Neoplasms, Thyroid Nodule, Thyroid Function Tests, Referral and Consultation, Ultrasonography, Interventional
Diagnosis, Differential, Incidental Findings, Biopsy, Fine-Needle, Humans, Thyroid Neoplasms, Thyroid Nodule, Thyroid Function Tests, Referral and Consultation, Ultrasonography, Interventional
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 60 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
