
EDITOR, - In his apologia on the genocide in Rwanda R Hugh James is selective to the point of misleading readers.1 For a comprehensive analysis, beyond the limits of this letter, I commend the lucid (horrific) 440 page report by African Rights.2,3 The specific points that James raises should, however, be answered before they become received wisdom. Firstly, he advances the now discredited simplistic view that ethnic antagonism explains the genocide. In fact, the first people to die were the Hutu …
Rwanda, Humans, War Crimes
Rwanda, Humans, War Crimes
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
