<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
To determine the extent of agreement between clinical information recorded on surgery computers of selected general practitioners and similar information in manual records of letters received from hospital consultants and kept in the general practitioners' files.Hospital consultants' letters in the manual records of selected general practitioners were photocopied and the consultants' clinical diagnoses were compared with diagnoses recorded on computer.General practices in the United Kingdom using computers provided by VAMP Health for recording clinical information.2491 patients who received one of three non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and who attended 58 practices whose computer recorded data were considered after a preliminary review to be of satisfactory quality.Among 1191 patients for whom consultants' letters were forwarded a clinical diagnosis reflecting the diagnosis noted on a consultant letter was present on the computer record for 1038 (87%).Clinical information available on the computer records of the general practitioners who participated in this study is satisfactory for many clinical studies.
Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Microcomputers, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Data Collection, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Diagnosis, Humans, Safety, Family Practice, Correspondence as Topic, Medical Records, United Kingdom
Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Microcomputers, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Data Collection, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Diagnosis, Humans, Safety, Family Practice, Correspondence as Topic, Medical Records, United Kingdom
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 822 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.01% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |