Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ British Journal of O...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Short wavelength automated perimetry and tamoxifen use

Authors: A, Eisner; D F, Austin; J R, Samples;

Short wavelength automated perimetry and tamoxifen use

Abstract

Oestrogen receptors (ORs) have been reported to be present in the retina, and the selective oestrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen has been reported to affect colour vision. This study aimed, therefore, to determine whether standard doses of tamoxifen affect visual sensitivities mediated via short wavelength sensitive (SWS) cones.Two types of visual fields were measured for middle aged women who were being treated with 20 mg of tamoxifen daily as adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer. Visual fields were measured using short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) and frequency doubling perimetry (FDP). For SWAP, 24-2 visual fields were analysed. No subjects had tamoxifen retinopathy or other eye disease. For each type of visual field, mean deviations (MDs) were assessed as a function of the duration of tamoxifen use, using a cross sectional design. In addition, the difference between the two types of MDs was computed after standardisation of each type of MD separately, and this difference itself was evaluated as a function of the duration of tamoxifen use. Duration dependent changes for SWAP were further evaluated as a function of eccentricity within the visual field, and the visual field data were compared with foveal data obtained psychophysically.SWAP sensitivities depended on the duration of tamoxifen use. Subjects who used tamoxifen for about 2 years or less were significantly more likely than subjects who had longer use to have high MDs. The difference between the standardised SWAP and FDP MDs likewise was significantly related to the duration of use, whereas duration of use effects for FDP itself were reduced or absent. Although the duration of use effect observed for SWAP was strongest in the peripheral portion of the visual field, there was evidence of changes in SWS cone mediated vision even at the fovea.Standard dosages of tamoxifen can affect SWAP visual fields. The effects of tamoxifen are not equivalent for SWAP and FDP, indicating that tamoxifen affects some types of visual pathways preferentially or selectively. SWS cone pathways, in particular, are affected. SWAP appears able to reveal effects of tamoxifen occurring years before completion of the standard 5 year regimen of use.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators, Fovea Centralis, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal, Middle Aged, Drug Administration Schedule, Tamoxifen, Cross-Sectional Studies, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Linear Models, Psychophysics, Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells, Humans, Visual Field Tests, Female, Visual Fields, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    36
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
36
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research