
To investigate factors related to the use of eye care services in Australia.Health, eye care service use, and sociodemographic data were collected in a structured interview of participants in a population based study. All participants had a standard eye examination.Men (OR 1.3 CL 1.02, 1.7), those who spoke Greek (OR 2.1 CL 1.1, 3.8) or Italian (OR 1.9 CL 1.0, 3.3), and those without private health insurance (OR 1.59 CL 1.22, 2.04) were more likely to have not used eye care services. Ophthalmology services were utilised at lower rates in rural areas (OR 0.14 CL 0.09, 0.2). Approximately 40% of participants with undercorrected refractive error, cataract, and undiagnosed glaucoma had seen either an ophthalmologist, optometrist, or both within the last year.Despite the similarity in prevalence of eye disease in urban and rural areas, significant differences exist in the utilisation of eye care services. Sex, private health insurance, urban residence, and the ability to converse in English were significant factors associated with eye healthcare service use. Many participants had undiagnosed eye disease despite having seen an eye care provider in the last year.
Adult, Male, vision, Time Factors, Eye Diseases, 610, Rural Health, Age Distribution, Ethnicity, Prevalence, Humans, Centre for Eye Research Australia, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Insurance, Health, visual health, Urban Health, CERA, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, eye research, ophthalmology, Ophthalmology, Regression Analysis, Female, Rural Health Services
Adult, Male, vision, Time Factors, Eye Diseases, 610, Rural Health, Age Distribution, Ethnicity, Prevalence, Humans, Centre for Eye Research Australia, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Insurance, Health, visual health, Urban Health, CERA, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, eye research, ophthalmology, Ophthalmology, Regression Analysis, Female, Rural Health Services
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 121 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
