Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ British Journal of O...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Article . 1999 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Other literature type . 1999
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Paediatric pseudophakia---choosing the implant power

Authors: J D, Young;

Paediatric pseudophakia---choosing the implant power

Abstract

Posterior chamber lens implantation is increasingly employed in the management of paediatric cataract, sometimes in infants within a few weeks of birth. The need to implant a lens of fixed power into an eye that is still growing creates a problem—what power lens should be selected? This is especially a dilemma in infants under 18 months of age, the period of most rapid postnatal ocular growth, during which there can be a substantial myopic shift. Using hand held instruments, reliable keratometry and axial length measurements can be obtained in children, and implant power calculations using adult formulas are accurate in the paediatric eye.1 However, implanting a lens at the calculated power risks significant myopia at ocular maturity. The paediatric cataract surgeon therefore now requires an additional “formula”, one that will predict the final refraction for any selected lens on the basis of the patient’s age. An initial …

Related Organizations
Keywords

Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Pseudophakia, Humans, Infant, Child, Refraction, Ocular

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
bronze